In order to evaluate any project progress on site, the employer will then employ architect/superintending officer (for next we will use S.O.). If the employer does not pay to the contractor, then we can assume that the employer has entered breach of contract. Here, payment is a consideration which creates a legal binding between the employer and the contractor. The main obligation of the employer is to pay to the contractor what has been built. The employer’s obligations in both contracts are spread throughout some clauses which implied these obligations. However, it does not mean that there is no employer’s obligation in the contracts. Both PWD and PAM do not provide a certain clause to state the employer’s obligations. These similarities are only in terms of obligation of each party involves in construction project.Īnalysis of the Study: Similarities of Three Standard Forms of Contractįor government projects, usually for civil engineering worksįor building works for both government and private employerĪmong these 3 standard forms, all of them have the description about obligations of the employer, although only CIDB which expressly describe this obligation (clause 6). Below is a table about similarities of 3 standard forms of contract used in Malaysia, namely PWD 203A, PAM 2006, and CIDB 2000.
0 kommentar(er)
